I have arrived in Basel. The river fills the screen, and I am speaking in the corner of the video about something that takes much longer to build than a following: knowing who you are.
In the recording, I say that this understanding needs experience. You have to live, meet things you did not expect, and remain open enough to learn from them. Then comes the harder part: staying faithful to the person you have decided to become.
Faithful to your people. To your journey. To the character you are building.
And still willing to grow.
That tension is the point. I want to develop without handing every passing trend the authority to decide who I should be.
Knowing yourself takes contact with life
It is easy to declare an identity before it has been tested. I am honest. I am brave. I am someone who finishes what he starts. The words become more interesting when telling the truth costs something, when a decision is uncomfortable, or when the project stops being exciting.
Those are examples of the work I am talking about, not additional events from the clip. Experience gives a value somewhere to become visible. It also reveals where our description of ourselves needs correcting.
This is why openness matters in the video. If I only accept experiences that confirm the person I already think I am, I leave very little room to discover anything.
My earlier article about why I started posting describes wanting to develop my own voice. A voice develops through use. It also develops through listening.
Leave room to change
In the clip, I push against getting stuck in an ideology and stopping there. Loyalty to yourself can become an excuse if it means defending every old opinion forever.
I find it useful to separate a commitment, a method and a belief. The commitment might be to speak honestly. The method might be a video, an essay or a difficult conversation. A belief is something I currently think is true, and new evidence can change it.
The first diagram gives each of those a different job. Keep examining the commitment through your actions. Experiment with the method. Reconsider the belief when you learn something. Changing a format or correcting an opinion does not automatically erase the person doing it.
Suppose a familiar video format helps you explain an idea clearly. You can use it. The question becomes more serious when the format demands that you exaggerate an experience, perform an opinion you do not hold, or humiliate somebody to keep the audience watching.
What exactly are you adapting? And what are you giving away?
The work has to belong to you
The second half of the video is blunt about shortcuts: quick success, quick money, the promise of a result without the work. My concern is what happens when the shortcut becomes the whole direction.
Kennon Sheldon and Andrew Elliot studied goals aligned with people’s developing interests and values. Across three longitudinal datasets, this alignment was associated with more sustained effort and greater goal attainment. It offers a useful connection between choosing a direction and continuing to work at it. Sheldon and Elliot, 1999.
That finding does not promise success to everyone who feels authentic. It does make me ask a better question than whether something is popular: would I still want to become capable of this if the attention arrived slowly?
Learning a skill, revising an idea and making something useful leave you with something to carry into the next attempt. A spike in attention, on its own, cannot tell you what you have learned.
Before borrowing a trend
Here is a practical extension of the video. Before joining a trend, name what you want to express. Then examine what participation asks you to do. Finally, imagine returning to the post after the excitement has passed.
The second diagram follows that sequence: purpose, conduct, then the later view. A trend can give an idea a convenient format. These questions help me decide whether the idea still belongs to me inside that format.
Research by Erica Bailey and colleagues found an association between authentic Facebook expression and life satisfaction. A separate experiment found better mood and positive affect within participants during authentic posting, but no significant change in life satisfaction. This concerns expression and experience, not a formula for audience growth. Bailey and colleagues, 2020.
The video ends by looking beyond the brief moment of fame toward value that can last across generations. That connects with my reflection on success and the legacy we leave: the result matters, and so does the person producing it.
Keep learning. Keep making. Let your experience change you deeply enough that the next trend does not have to.
Sources and notes
-
Original video and thumbnail: Eduard Luta on TikTok, published 6 October 2026; duration 128 seconds. Basel is named in the opening. The article paraphrases the full audio and caption; uncertain automatic-transcription wording is not quoted.
-
Primary research: Kennon M. Sheldon and Andrew J. Elliot, 1999, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482; Erica R. Bailey and colleagues, 2020, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18539-w, also available in the UCL repository. Sources checked 10 October 2026.
-
The decision examples and both diagrams are editorial extensions. They contain no measured scores, calculations or promised outcomes. The video’s fifteen minutes of fame is a warning about priorities, not a measured duration of fame or a prediction about somebody’s future.